Karina ([info]darynthe) wrote,
@ 2007-07-08 11:22:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: creative
Entry tags:metaphysics of the soul in the buffyvers

Buffyverse Metathon entry

Metaphysics of the soul in the buffyverseSelf-inflicted Soul

 Special thanks to  [info]ana_christina  for very fast editing

 

 The Buffyverse has a long love-hate relationship with the concept of soul. My first association in regards to the verse is –gasp- that of WORTH. Yes, from the first episode, we are fed the notion that ensouled entities are valuable, worth fighting for, redeemable, human.  While unsouled and de-souled ones are to be killed, detested, despised and thought of as animals or things.

 

By an untold agreement all human beings are born with a soul, consequently, good by nature.  Demons, vampires included, on the other side are the enemy, if not by their depredatory nature, then because of their lack of soul.

 

But  as we know, there are really no vampires or demons we can study in real life.  So any metaphysical study of them is slightly superfluous if we don’t also try to find a deeper meaning as a whole for their fictional existence, as they are painted, within the Buffyverse.

 

As Joss Whedon explained, the Buffyverse is a metaphor.  And a very well done too.  Vampires represent teenager rebellion.

 

And in the case of the two main heroes (or antiheros, you choose) of the show, Angel and Spike, they also represent a lost function of the collective unconscious, an archetype. 

 

But first a very short explanation before I start on this particular analysis for the metaphysics of soul in the Buffy verse. 

 

As we know, metaphysics is a part of philosophy that tries to analyse and define the existence (ontology) of material things.  One of its branches is Science. 

 

But as the reality of the Buffyverse depends largely, if not exclusively, on the psyche of its creators and writers, it is indeed there  where we can try to find any meaning to their strange journey of the soul.

 

  1. Existentialism vs Fate or The paradox of Spike

 

The BtVS series relied from its beginnings on the notion of predetermination of destiny.  Starting with the curse of Buffy  being the Chosen One, to the fact that she had a prophecy to fulfil.

 

Apparently this leaves little to free will.   If this is the case for every creature of evil or darkness, then we can safely say that Buffy is doing the only possible thing when killing all of soulless creatures, as they have no free will and if the first concepts we got in Season 1 of demons and vampires were correct, then there wasn’t anything resembling humanity in them.  When there was no soul, there was no humanity.

 

But as the years went by and we were introduced closer to the reality of vampires and other demons, we found out very puzzling and diverse experiences that told us otherwise.

 

Some demons weren’t bad by nature.   There were Clem and Whistler and Lorne and others.   

 

As Joss Whedon said, and I agree totally here, in the Buffyverse, the soul was the moral compass.   A souled individual was naturally compelled towards goodness and a soulless one compelled towards evil by their very nature. 

 

A vampire, would be something more complex that either humans or demons, because of its mix of both.   When the vampire was born, the human soul of the individual left its body and was replaced by a very ancient and simple entity that lived for its bloodlust.

The vampire is still the person it was in the way that it has its memory, personality, physical appearance.  And what are we but our memories, I ask?

 

All that package that we are is still there, the so called spirit, the essence of their human psyche is still within their reach, but totally surpassed by the power of the demonic soul.   (1)

 

And there was Spike, who against his alleged predestination, found free choice and built back a morality for him, in fact, he made a soul for himself in every relevant aspect. 

 

Apparently, Spike is living an existentialist kind of life, where he is not guided by any law regarding predestination.  He can choose his own soul status although as a vampire he shouldn’t be able to.  Therein lies the paradox.  

 

So different from Angel or Angelus, who are in fact the same person despite all the efforts to divide him in two.  Angelus is incapable of desiring back his soul.  So is he a lesser individual?  A liar, pretending to be two people to look innocent both to himself and to his beloved Buffy?   Or simply does the Buffyverse have no logic at all since there is not such a thing as Spikelus?

 

 

And is the show existentialist or not?  I think the answer is not.    There is a whole intrinsic logic and more than four or five different interpretations to why a demon can choose to be moral even without a soul, and even build a soul for itself, turning the soul in the Buffyverse merely a prize for redemption and not the basis of humanity.  Off the top of my head:

 

a.  One would be a Christian reason d’etre for a vampire wanting back his soul, or merely getting back the power of sacrificing for others, as we saw Darla do for her son.   It’s called the gift of grace, it is given by God to his chosen ones, and I explained it more in my essay here.

 

b.  The second would be Joss Whedon's answer in a conference where he was asked about this.  He answered that William was a more developed individual than Angel, consequently free to live an existentialist life within a predetermined universe.

 

c.  A third one is a logical conclusion.  Simply, Giles was wrong.  The counsel of watchers, the books they had, they all lied.  Vampires are all individuals with humanity despite their lack of soul.  They are redeemable and worthy because of their understanding and human memory and personality.   And in this case, the soul is merely a painful switch that turns on the pangs of conscience.     The lie we are fed, is given to Buffy and all slayers to stop them from becoming the “vampire murderers”.   In my opinion this would be the most challenging explanation and the logical one to the problem of the soul in non humans in the Buffyverse.

 

It would also account for the fact that there are humans who despite their souls choose to act against their conscience.  We are all free.  Willow, an established goody-two-shoes, comes to mind in her murdering Warren and then trying to destroy the world to boot.    We haven’t see that much meanness since Angelus' return in Season 2.

 

This gives the series its entire array of shadows of grey and in fact, a  whole palette of colour that made it an icon for this and hopefully for next generations of fans.

 

The Anima, or the final frontier of the soul in the Buffyverse

 

Here my fourth explanation and the one I believe in most.  

 

For those of you new to the theory of archetypes, C.G.Jung made the most revolutionary analysis of humankind psyche that changed psychology as much as Einstein changed Physics.

 

He discovered certain models that exist in the unconscious of all the members of humankind; those are psychic forces that interact and change and try to make individuals and societies a whole, a unity.   It is the ultimate searched for illumination.

 

Those are the archetypes.    Hundreds of books have given psychological interpretation to many aspects of human activity in politics, sociology, history, and especially, in literature. 

 

Since Christipher Vogler’s book, “a writer’s journey” most screenwriters have understood and even included consciously archetypes and Campbell’s hero’s journey in their works. 

 

This is the case too with BtVS.   The archetype figures were included both consciously and unconsciously, in my opinion.   I have heard interviews where the words hero’s journey were applied by the writers both to Spike and Buffy.

 

This gives me full conviction that the concept of soul in the Buffyverse is intimately linked to that of the archetype of the Anima.

 

The lack of soul is in fact, the absence of the Anima.    (Soul in Latin and Italian is translated literarily as anima).

 

Anima would be the feminine side of  a masculine psyche.   If lacking, his Self is not complete, there is not unity or health.  A whole journey should be undertaken until that missing part is found and correctly accepted, assimilated and loved.

 

The usual road to find the Anima is romantic love, as in a numinous experience, or in the words of a very bad poet, an effulgent experience.

 

In fact, the lack of anima, shown as a lack of soul in vampires would be a great reference to our modern American society, so empty of feminine principles, dominated by selfish interest, the rational conscience has lost its soul as values have become anti-values.  Evil has replaced Good in a subtle way.

 

The road to become a healthy individual or society again lies in change.  The actors of the change are the archetypes and they need representations in characters.   Transformation needs something to start, something that will put things upside down, a sacred event, and that can only be love, the kind of love that happens once in a lifetime.   A syzygy.   Then love is the transforming event, and Buffy is the representation of the Anima.  

 

We have two different cases of men who strive to find their anima.

 

First, we have Angel.  He has been imposed a soul, it is a curse because he is not ready for it and doesn’t embrace it.   There hasn’t been the transforming event that may unify him with it.   The rational constraint in him is very strong and when in contact with Buffy, as we see in “Innocence” he loses his soul.   And rejects Buffy at the same time.  He hates his love. He hates his Anima.  Yes he obsesses with her, with Buffy.

A deep problem in his psyche should be resolved before he can take the road to illumination.   

 

In the end we find Angel is incapable of finding love in any woman.   I find it impossible from this interpretation for Angel to be shanshued unless he comes to terms with Buffy as his anima.    You will see that when that time arrives, it won’t be a problem if some new enemy comes and steals his soul.  He won’t need it to be a moral individual anymore.

 

The second case is Spike.   As we all know, he has gone through a different road.  His problem with the anima starts with Cecily's rejection.  Something inside himself is desperate for the unity and finds none.  He takes the vampire life with a woman who has no anima to offer, another unsouled and damned vampire he tries to love, although every quality of feminine in her is corrupted and perverse.

 

Upon living with Buffy and seeing her, he find himself called to his own journey (as interesting discussed in the dream interpretation essay posted earlier in this Methathon).  It is for him, through the love experience that he makes his transformation and reaches for his soul, while looking desperately for his Anima in Buffy.

 

He finally finds it, (2) and is liberated to death after doing his self sacrifice for a noble cause, something that is for once not about Buffy, but about saving the world.   

 

He can do it because the Self is complete now.   

 Conclusion

BtVS use the soul has many different possible interpretations, such as existencialism, determinism, and others; all possibly valid, despite some apparently contradictory events and characters.   Starting a study of the soul metaphysics can entail many difficulties that only can be surmounted by determining the nature of the philosophy and psychological relations and facts governing its use.   

As a work of fiction, it is necesary to figure out an intuitive and overall tying-up approach which may be provided by the analysis of archetypes as the source of the metaphysic problem in the series.


 

Footnotes:

(1)  It is interesting to note that when a vampire is resouled, the human soul takes complete control of the demoniac soul.   So it is much stronger. 

(2)  From a canonical point of view, this could only have happened the night before the final battle.  I assume this as Joss Whedom mentioned it as the most important moment of the whole show.

 

Some sources:

Wikipedia

Le paradoxe de l’ame, by Diane Couisineu

All things philosophical in BtVS http://www.atpobtvs.com/index.html

The interpretation of Fairy Tales by Marie-Louise Von Franz

 

 




(Post a new comment)


[info]hotspur18
2007-07-08 02:37 pm UTC (link)
You did it! And wonderfully well, too!

I like your idea that the soul is simply a prod to conscience and that redemption is possible without it :-) - very well argued!

Good definition of the Anima - have you considered looking at the Platonic ideal as well, that the possessor of what is necessary for the divided soul of each to be complete may be of any sex, any age?

*just call me Devil's Advocate, here, because I actually agree with your definition...*

:-) xx

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]darynthe
2007-07-08 04:23 pm UTC (link)
Oh wow, thanks for the compliment! You know how I was two days ago, and thinking it was due yesterday didn't help either! LOL

Well yes, I think that Spike came to change the view of what is a soul in the Buffyverse. In fact his story arc is nothing but perfection from any theorical POV we may analyse it! Angel is interesting too.

No, I hadn't know of that thing regarding the platonic ideal. I think that the fact is that most people in the world do find unity and balance in a relationship with the opposite sex so I would give more weight to Jung's idea of anima/animus.

But I got a book with many excepts from multiple philosophers -such as Plato- that I intended to read for this essay but didn't have the time cause I started a new job last week. You did a better work in researching philosophy for your essay! :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hotspur18
2007-07-08 04:31 pm UTC (link)
*L* No, not really, I just took a different approach - yours was more psychological, mine tried to dip its little toes in theology!

I think this is one subject that's never going to be exhausted...

:-) xx

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]darynthe
2007-07-08 04:40 pm UTC (link)
I wrote another essay on the christian connotation in Spike's soul journey. http://darynthe.livejournal.com/tag/soul+and+christian+metaphor+in+spike%27s+a

Maybe you can check out when you have time. :) Yeah, I know what you mean! This topic is totally fascinating!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kaskait
2007-07-09 02:12 am UTC (link)
Fantastic Essay.

I always thought that William/Spike was more advanced then Angel. Angel was barely into his twenties when he was turned and he was a selfish child. But Spike was a man even though he was a lost soul.

Anyway, I still think Spike is more advanced than Angel. He chose a soul and love while Angel remains afraid of both.

I haven't read the comic series continuation of the series. So who knows how Whedon will finally end this triangle.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]darynthe
2007-07-09 04:38 am UTC (link)
Thanks my dear for the praise and the comment. Mm, yes in the bottom we all know this is it. It takes some marbles to love like that. I admire such determination and fearlessness. I guess only time will tell. But I doubt the comics is a place to tie up all the loose ends. Maybe a movie, and then I still doubt it. We need the series back.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mabus101
2007-07-09 11:53 am UTC (link)
This is a fascinating article, Darynthe...I find the whole question of Buffyverse souls to be one of the most interesting aspects of the shows. (I mostly write fic about this, rather than meta...but maybe for the metathon...)

However, I'm a little in the dark, as the anima is not a concept I'm deeply familiar with. It would have helped had you included a little more background information on the subject to make it clearer what kind of deficiency not having an anima would mean.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]darynthe
2007-07-10 05:31 pm UTC (link)
You should try writing on it for the metathon. I haven't seen much exploration regarding the christian aspects of the soul.

I will be happy to expand on the anima thing. But in general it relates to feminine qualities. I will make a post on it when I have more time and let you know if you are still interested. Thanks!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mabus101
2007-07-11 11:44 am UTC (link)
I'm actually considering that. I'm actually not all that in-the-know on classical concepts of the soul, but I do have some other ideas that might be interesting.

I have a general idea of what the anima is, just not why it's so important. I guarantee you I'll stay interested.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shapinglight
2007-07-09 06:51 pm UTC (link)
Great entry - and I love the idea of Spike being destiny-free and thus allowed to live an existentialist rather than a predeterminist life. That's what I always thought too, and why he so easily shrugged off not being the 'chosen' vampire in season 5 of AtS.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]darynthe
2007-07-10 05:32 pm UTC (link)
I am glad you agree and in fact we have loads of proof of this being the case. Who knows what will happen in the future. Thanks for commenting!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]avidrosette
2007-07-10 05:37 pm UTC (link)
Very interesting essay! I love the way you pull together diverse concepts and come up with fresh interpretations of thorny issues.

Angel and Spike... also represent a lost function of the collective unconscious, an archetype.

Interesting! I'd like to hear more about this.

The BtVS series relied from its beginnings on the notion of predetermination of destiny. Starting with the curse of Buffy being the Chosen One, to the fact that she had a prophecy to fulfil.

Fascinating place to start a consideration of the soul. I love that you brought this idea into it.

As Joss Whedon said, and I agree totally here, in the Buffyverse, the soul was the moral compass. A souled individual was naturally compelled towards goodness and a soulless one compelled towards evil by their very nature.

Hmm, I wonder if when he said "moral compass," he didn't mean more that a souled individual would have an innate understanding of his actions as good or evil, while an unsouled individual would not. The souled being would have the awareness of - and therefore the choice between - good and evil, while the unsouled being would not have that basic ability to distinguish between the two, and therefore would have significantly reduced efficacy in the matter of choosing between them (the equivalent of a color-blind person being presented with a series of red and green buttons and told he must always press the red one: they all look the same to him).

Apparently, Spike is living an existentialist kind of life, where he is not guided by any law regarding predestination. He can choose his own soul status although as a vampire he shouldn’t be able to. Therein lies the paradox.

Nice point

And is the show existentialist or not? I think the answer is not. There is a whole intrinsic logic and more than four or five different interpretations to why a demon can choose to be moral even without a soul, and even build a soul for itself, turning the soul in the Buffyverse merely a prize for redemption and not the basis of humanity.

Wonderful formulation of this idea

The second would be Joss Whedon's answer in a conference where he was asked about this. He answered that William was a more developed individual than Angel, consequently free to live an existentialist life within a predetermined universe.

You've done your homework :-)

It would also account for the fact that there are humans who despite their souls choose to act against their conscience. We are all free. Willow, an established goody-two-shoes, comes to mind in her murdering Warren and then trying to destroy the world to boot.

Ah, I see you address the choice issue here.

The usual road to find the Anima is romantic love, as in a numinous experience, or in the words of a very bad poet, an effulgent experience.

Love the connection you make between theory and canon there.

First, we have Angel. He has been imposed a soul, it is a curse because he is not ready for it and doesn’t embrace it. There hasn’t been the transforming event that may unify him with it.

What an interesting interpretation of that

What a thought-provoking essay. I'm not usually a fan of Jungian analysis, but in this case it feels perfectly warranted. I love the way you interpret Angel's and Spike's character arcs using the idea of the Anima. The concept fits the show's events very nicely and predicts future arcs that feel in keeping with existing canon. You even have me convinced that the writers may have had the idea in the back of their mind while writing the show. Your use of the Anima here also makes me wonder if perhaps Buffy's journey can't be considered in a similar way, with her ultimate acceptance of her slayer powers despite their dark source as the embrace of her Animus, and her refusal to accept an increase in those dark powers when the shadow men try to force it on her as a final balancing of Anima and Animus.

Thank you for a terrific essay!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]darynthe
2007-07-14 05:46 pm UTC (link)
Thanks so much my dear! I am glad you found it interesting, and I thank you for the challenge, you made some great ideas over there.

About what you say of no having a soul would be equivalent to being color blind in the moral arena... I rather think this is not the case with the vampires we know better. They are aware of the nature of evil. Some relish on it, such as Angelus, they know perfectly well they are doing wrong and that is what they wanted and chose. Angel said as much in Damange. He was in for the evil. It was an art for him. I just wonder if the newest vampires we see Buffy kill day after day have such judgement, though. They seem much more instinctual, even if capable of intelligence.

Your idea is interesting, and maybe you are right, Buffy needed to accept her Animus and her shadow too. They are the same thing. Her dark side, her desire incarnate in Spike, everything that is forbidden. The last season was one of completeness and maturity for Buffy. Wished the series had ended there and no bloody comic S8 had come our ways.

Thanks again!! :D *hugs*




(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]candleanfeather
2007-07-10 06:03 pm UTC (link)
A very interesting post on a difficult subject. You totally succeed in showing the richness of the soul metaphor, how it can differ from one character to another and lead to different stories and interpretations, without forgetting to signal the possible contradictions between the metaphors. May I rec you an excellent article in Slayage n°18 by Scott Mac Laren :The evolution of Joss Whedon's Vampires Mythology and of the Ontologie of the Soul. He explains how two concepts of the soul coexists in Joss Whedon's universe and analyses the dynamics between them. Here's the link : http://slayageonline.com/essays/slayage18/McLaren.htm

I'm sure it will interest you.

Now about a very minor point in your post Simply, Giles was wrong. The counsel of watchers, the books they had, they all lied. It's not necessarily that the Watcher Council lied or was even totally wrong but rather that their knowledge was incomplete. In Innocence the scene with the Judge shows that some vampires still have some remainders of humanity but that others (Angelus in this case) don't. So there're different sorts of vampires. But of course, in normal circumstances, when meeting a vampire, for a Watcher or a Slayer, that difference surely doesn't jump to attention. :D
Later in season three, the writers overtly use this theme in Beauty and the Beast, introducing a strong shade in Giles's opinion about monsters :

Giles: Maybe. Maybe not. In my experience, there are... two types of
monster. The first, uh, can be redeemed, or more importantly, wants to
be redeemed.

Buffy: And the second type?

Giles: The second is void of humanity, cannot respond to reason... or
love.

But this as previously said is just a detail in regard to your subject. Thank you again for your work on this complicated subject.

(Reply to this)


[info]moscow_watcher
2007-07-14 02:56 pm UTC (link)
I finally found time to comment on your essay (sorry it took me so much time).

First of all, your essay offers fantastic insights and great food for thought.

I see the issue of soul in Jossverse a bit differently - as a plot trick that became bigger than the plot. In season 1 the issues iof the sould didn't exist at all: vampires have demon souls, humans have human souls. In season 2 the Angelus arс forced Joss to change the rules - and he did it without thinking about consequences. The black\white attitude worked great for a while. But in season 4 BtVS/Season 1 AtS the rules changed again because Joss integrated two demons (Spike and Anya) into BtVS main cast and has started AtS with good demon Doyle as Angel's right-hand man.

So, I think it's impossible to build a consistent soul theory regarding all Jossverse at once. There are three different soul theories. The first - for season 1, the second - for seasons 2-3 and the third - for BtVS s4-7 and AtS s 1-5.

And - thank you again for great essay.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…